Welcome to Our Website

Hacked spss 17 crack serial keygen

Crack Serial Number Spss 15

Serial is working, thanks so much January 26, 2020 at 8: 50 PM Unknown said. IBM SPSS Statistics v23 x86 + Serial key. Download Spss 17 Full Version For Windows 7 32 Bit. Spss Statistics 17 Keygen Crack Serial.

Easyworship 7.1.4.0 Crack 2020 Product Key Download [Updated]

IBM SPSS not only be use to process the data in the social. Announcements of publications available. Spss Statistics 22 Crack Plus Serial Key Full Version Free https://globalbeatschool.ru/crack/?key=1314. Conecte-se com seus amigos on-line.

Spss 17 License Code Keygen Download - Estudio sobre las

SPSS 25 Crack is a latest statistical data analysis software. To improve search results for Spss 17 License Code try to exclude using words such as: serial, code, keygen, hacked, patch, warez, etc. EasyWorship Crack Full Incl Serial Keygen At the heart of the Presentation Designer is a robust new Inspector panel. Spss 17 crack serial keygen.

Download spss statistics 20 trial version for free (Windows)

Download SPSS STATISTICS V17.0 keygen by EDGEISO at our cracksguru database. IBM SPSS Statistics - a full-featured system designed to solve business and research problems using data a. You can test out hundreds of different variables on your data to see how figures or performance would change under different circumstances. Description IBM SPSS Amos 21 Full Crack: IBM SPSS Amos gives you the power to easily perform structural equation modeling (SEM).

  • Download S spss 17.0 serial number generator, crack or patch
  • Serial Code Spss 17 Software - Free Download Serial Code
  • Install Spss 17 Di Windows 7
  • IBM SPSS Statistics 21 Full Crack
  • Spss 17 Download Full Crack - Fun With English
  • IBM SPSS Statistics 24 Crack Keygen Full Version Download
  • Spss 17.0 Activation Code Crack Serial Keygen
  • Free spss 17 download for windows 7
  • SPSS Decision Trees 17
  • Spss 17 With Crack Serial
  • Spss 17 Crack Key Product - Boycott Blueprint Nightclub

Spss 17 Crack Gratuit

IBM SPSS 25 Crack is a statistical information evaluation and data analysis software program. SPSS Crack Full Version 26.0 Setup with Tested SPSS. IBM Spss 25 Crack Download Free Final Update Is Here: [HOST] – Hello guys today we are uploading IBM Spss Crack 25 Serial Key. Latest update: Tuesday, November 17, 2020.

Spss 17 License Code Keygen 1323

Berkeley Electronic Press Selected Works. Spss 16 Free Download With Crack And Keygen. Enter your license code provided for the software, and click "Next". Spss 17 Crack Key Product https://globalbeatschool.ru/crack/?key=1322.

Ibm Spss Free Download Latest Version Crack Key

Many downloads like Spss 17 Licence Code may also include a crack, serial number, unlock code, cd key or keygen. Spss Statistics 22 Crack Plus Serial Key: Spss Statistics 22 Crack is powerful and complete pack of analytic techniques and time-saving capabilities to help you quickly and easily find new insights in your data. You should see an application called License Authorization Wizard. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Crack Free Download IBM SPSS 25 Crack essentially designs for Statistics.

Comparing the Sensitivity of Visual Evoked Potential and Standard Achromatic Perimetry in Diagnosis of Optic Neuritis- Juniper Publishers

Juniper Publishers- JOJ Ophthalmology
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic power of Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and Standard Achromatic Perimetry (SAP) in a group of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and a history of optic neuritis (ON).
Methods: 136 eyes of 68 patients (11 male and 57 female, average age 27.18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of MS underwent SAP and pattern VEPs. 67 eyes (49.2%) had no history of ocular involvement and a negative ophthalmologic examination, while 69 had proven ON according to physical examination. The mean deviation (MD) and the pattern standard deviation (PSD) of perimetry and the amplitude & latency of VEP in both normal and abnormal eyes were recorded. MD & PSD<0.5% and pl00 latency more than 118 millisecond were considered abnormal.
Results: MD was abnormal in 93.9% of the eyes with ON, PSD was abnormal in 69.4% and latency was abnormal in 55% of the affected eyes with ON. In overall, VEP can diagnose 55% of the eyes affected with ON and SAP can diagnose 96%. In statistical analysis of MD, PSD, latency and amplitude values with Mann-Whitney Test MD and PSD were statistically significant (MD has p<0.001, PSD has P<0.05, latency has p=0.83 and amplitude has p=0.38).
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that SAP is more sensitive than VEP in the diagnosis of ON. SAP is a less operator and patient dependent technique and the patient test reliability can be assessed with parameters such as False-positive response rate, False- negative response rate, Fixation loss & Short-term fluctuation measurement. Because of these advantages, SAP has better sensitivity than VEP in the diagnosis of ON. Our results suggest that clinical and subclinical visual involvement of ON can be better diagnosed using both SAP and VEP tests, together.
Keywords: Keywords: Diagnostic power of SAP & VEP; Multiple sclerosis

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease that involves the Optic Nerve, brain and spinal cord by damaging the myelin sheath [1]. The disease can affect patients' visual pathway and therefore lead to Optic Neuritis (ON) which is an eye discomfort accompanied by decreased visual acuity, changes in the visual field, uncontrollable rapid eye movements and double vision (clinical and frequent subclinical evident manifestations) [1-3]. De-myelinating disease leads to less responses of the brain and the optic nerve which is detected by the visual evoked.
potential [3-5]. Alterations in the visual evoked potential (VEP) and standard achromatic perimetry (SAP) have been reported to be useful in patients with MS. Many studies have shown the presence of abnormality in the results of VEP and SAP in optic neuritis [6], but there is little agreement about the prevalence of these abnormalities or about which examination is more sensitive [7-10]. In this article, our aim is to evaluate the diagnostic power of SAP & VEP in a group of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and a history of optic neuritis.

Material and Methods

Sixty eight patients with ON and MS were recruited from the neurology and neuro-ophthalmology clinics of Rassoul Akram hospital in 2010-2011. The diagnosis of ON/MS was made based on standard clinical symptoms, examination findings, and radiologic abnormalities. In all patients, the disease was in remission and no patient was affected by any general disease apart from MS [11].
The diagnosis of ON was based on clinical signs and symptoms; such as: history of a progressive decrease of vision, color vision deficit, painful eye movements, fundus examination and relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) which is diagnosed by a neurologist or neuro-ophthalmologist. Patients voluntarily participated in this study and all participants were enrolled after an informed consent was obtained. All patients underwent full ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, slit lamp biomicroscopy, applantation tonometry, and fundus examination after pupillary dilation. VEP pattern reversal was performed (Sirius Galileo; Esaote Biomedica, Florence, Italy). Latency and amplitude were recorded and AP100 latency>118ms (i.e., 2SD above the mean) was considered abnormal.
Standard achromatic perimetry (SAP) was performed by means ofthe Humphrey Field Analyzer 750 (model 750; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) using the 30-2 program with the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) standard strategy. Two consecutive visual field examinations were performed for each patient, but only the second was evaluated for the purpose of the study and only if reliability indices were normal. The criteria for abnormality were mean deviation (MD) or pattern standard deviation (PSD) and were labeled abnormal by the instrument's software. VEP and SAP were done for all patients with one expert optometrist.
Patient data were collected through questionnaires, respectively, were entered into the SPSS software version 18.0 and were then analyzed. Maximum, minimum, and SD±Mean were reported for the quantitative data and for the qualitative data, the number (percentage) was stated. The Chi-Square test, with the aid of SPPS software was used to evaluate the relationship between qualitative variables and Mann-Whitney test was used for evaluation of normality between data and a P-value of<0.05 was considered valuable. VEP and SAP were done in all 68 patients (136 eyes). The age, sex, MD, PSD, amplitude and latency recorded are shown in Table 1. Results
From the 68 patients that were included in this study, 11 were male (16.2%) and 57 were female (83.8%). The mean±SD age of the patients was 27.18±8.5 (range:14-61 years old). 49.6% of the eyes that were included in the study were normal and 50.4% had ON. The mean MD value was -7.86db (with SD: 8.4) with a range of -34.49db to7.57db. Also, the mean±SD MD value in normal eyes was -4.89db±7.12 with a range of -34.49db and 7.57db, while the mean value±SD of MD in the affected eyes was-10.63db±8.98 with a minimum of -31.28db and a 5.18db maximum. MD was negative in 19.1 % of the normal eyes and positive in 80.9%, while being negative in 6.1% and positive in 93.9% of the eyes affected with ON. The mean±SD, PSD value was 4.82d3.6 with a minimum of 1.06db and a maximum of 14.46db. PSD value in normal eyes had a mean±SD of 3.55db±3.09 with a minimum and maximum of 1.06db and 14.13db; and the mean value of PSD in affected eyes was 5.78db (SD: ±3.75) with a minimum of 1.34db and a 14.13db maximum. PSD was negative in 59.6% and positive in 40.4% of the normal eyes and 30.6% negative and 69.4% positive in the affected eyes with ON.
The mean±SD latency value was 112.03ms±18.98 with a range of 58ms to 157ms. The mean±SD latency value in normal eyes was 109.98ms±17.03 with a range of 58ms to 157ms while in the affected eyes, the mean±SD value of latency was 114.07ms±19.85 with a 58ms minimum and a maximum of 150ms. Also, latency was negative in 70.6% and positive in 29.4% of the normal eyes, while being 45% negative and 55% positive in the affected eyes with ON.
The mean±SD amplitude value was 8.79μv±6.41 with the minimum of 0.5μv and a maximum of 34.9μv. The mean±SD amplitude value in normal eyes was 10.04μv±6.76 with a range of 1.13μv to 27.90μv and in the affected eyes, the mean±SD value of amplitude was 7.71μv±5.86 with a 0.50μv minimum and a maximum of 27.90μv.
In statistical analysis of MD, PSD, latency and amplitude P<0.05, that statistically significant but latency has p=0.83 and values with Mann-Whitney Test, MD has p<0.001, PSD has amplitude has p=0.38 (Table2).
📷

Discussion

In many studies, subclinical alterations can be helpful in diagnosing some cases of the visual system in both normal and Multiple Sclerosis patients, but we found that there was little agreement about the prevalence of these abnormalities [12-15] and the fact that which abnormality has the most sensitivity(6,14). In our study there was no single examination detected in all cases of visual involvement. So, the VEP P100 latency is the most diffuse and also the parameter of it had been used for detection the optic nerve involvement, but it is not very sensitive for the diagnosis of post chiasmal localizations. The results of our study had been impacted by other related studies too.
On other hand, the result of other studies shows that the VEP P100 latency cannot detect all cases of optic nerve involvement [10]. Also, some studies demonstrate that automated perimetery can too be an excellent tool in evaluating neuro-ophthalmologic disorders. Our studies show that SAP is more sensitive than VEP in the diagnosis of ON. In overall, VEP can diagnose 55% of the affected eyes with ON and SAP can diagnose 96%. In statistical analysis of MD, PSD, latency and amplitude values with Mann- Whitney Test, MD has p<0.001 and PSD has P<0.05 and latency has p=0.83 and amplitude has p=0.38. SAP and is a less operator and patient-dependent technique and the patient test reliability can be assessed with parameters such as False-positive response rate, False-negative response rate, Fixation loss & Short-term fluctuation measurement.
In an article by Ruseckaite R et al. [16], the results on Frequency doubling illusion VEPs and automated perimetry in Multiple Sclerosis is shown. The recordings in the study were obtained from 27 Normal subjects, 26MS patients who had experienced Optic Neuritis (MSON) and 24MS patients without a history of ON (MSNON). Ruseckaite R et al. [16] study also demonstrated that discriminant models based on the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) thresholds and multi focal VEP (mfVEPs) were able to diagnose more that 90% of MSON patients, but performed poorly for MSNON patients.
Because of these advantages, SAP can have better sensitivity than VEP in the diagnosis of ON. (96%vs55%). Other advantages of SAP are as follows:

  1. Standardized testing conditions, which allow better serial and inter- institutional comparisons of fields
  2. Less technician dependence which improves sensitivity.
  3. Producing numerical data that are amenable to statistical analysis for comparisons and clinical studies.
In VEP, if a patient loses focus on the target, the test results may be false negative or false positive. For Most clinical situations, the VEP is of limited use. It is subject to numerous factors that may produce abnormal waveforms in the absence of visual pathway damage, including uncorrected refractive error, media opacity, amblyopia, fatigue, and inattention (either intentional or unintentional). In Most cases, the VEP is unnecessary for the diagnosis of optic neuropathy and is less accurate to quantify it than perimetry [8,9]
The two scenarios in which VEPs remain clinically useful are: First, the evaluation of the integrity of the visual pathway in infants or inarticulate adults. In this case, a preserved flash or pattern response confirms intact pathways and an abnormal flash response consistently reflects gross impairment. An abnormal pattern response is less useful, as it may indicate damage or this may be a false- negative result. Second, confirming intact visual pathways in patients with markedly abnormal subjective visual responses of a suspected nonorganic origin [10,11].
Corallo G et al. [17], in a study about conventional perimetry and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with Multiple Sclerosis, demonstrated that the group of asymptomatic subjects had abnormal Conventional Automated Perimetry (CAP) in 1 eye (6.25%), abnormal Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in 9 (56.2%), abnormal FDT in 11 (68.7%), and abnormal VEPs in 7 (43.7%). Also, Corallo G et al. [17] show that the combined use of all techniques allowed the researchers to identify silent optic nerve impairment in 15 (93.7%) eyes of MS patients. In another study by Della et al. [18], on the nerve fiber layer analysis with GDx with a variable corneal compensator in patients with Multiple Sclerosis, the result is shown that GDx VCC is less able to detect early defects in MS patients compared to the currently used standard techniques of SAP and VEPs.
At last in our cases, intact pattern had been developed a measure of expected acuity when stimuli of various sizes and confirms an intact visual pathway. Because voluntary inattention or de focusing may markedly reduce the pattern waveform, again, an abnormal or absent pattern response does not confirm organic disease.

Conclusion

According to the results of this study and what was discussed above, we suggest using both VEP and SAP tests for the diagnosis and follow up of Optic Neuritis in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Declaration


a) The manuscript is original work of author. All data, tables, figures, etc. used in the manuscript are prepared originally by authors, otherwise the sources are cited and reprint permission is attached.
b) The manuscript has not been and will not be published elsewhere or submitted elsewhere for publication.
c) Authors mention that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
submitted by JuniperPublishersOJO to u/JuniperPublishersOJO

Gioi thieu ve phan mem Eviews va cac phien ban Eviews hien hanh tai Luan Van Viet

Phần mềm Eviews là một trong những phần mềm được sử dụng trong phương pháp định lượng nhiều nhất. Không những thế, phần mềm eview là sự lựa chọn của nhiều học sinh, sinh viên cũng như giáo viên và những nhà nghiên cứu chuyên nghiệp. Hãy cùng Luận Văn 24 chuyên thuê chạy spss tìm hiểu trong bài viết này nhé.
📷
Giới thiệu về phần mềm Eviews và các phiên bản Eviews hiện hành

1. Giới thiệu chung về Eviews

Eviews cung cấp các công cụ phân tích dữ liệu phức tạp, hồi quy và dự báo chạy trên nền Windows. Với Eviews, ta có thể xây dựng một mối quan hệ thống kê từ dữ liệu có sẵn và sử dụng mối quan hệ này để dự báo các giá trị tương lai. Eviews có thể hữu ích trong nhiều lĩnh vực như phân tích và đánh giá dữ liệu khoa học, phân tích tài chính, dự báo kinh tế vĩ mô, mô phỏng, dự báo doanh số và phân tích chi phí. Đặc biệt Eviews là 1 phần mềm rất mạnh cho các nghiên cứu với dữ liệu thời gian và dữ liệu chéo với cỡ mẫu lớn.
Từ năm 1994 phần mềm eview 1.0 ra đời thì cho tới nay có những phiên bản eview mới như Eviews 10, eview 8, eview 6, …

2. Chức năng chính của Eviews

EVIEW được sử dụng trong thống kê và kinh tế lượng nhưng chuyên về kinh tế lượng hơn. Nếu đề tài nghiên cứu có sử dụng số liệu thứ cấp là số liệu có sẵn được thu thập theo thời gian (dữ liệu chuỗi thời gian) hoặc vừa thu thập theo thời gian vừa thu thập theo từng thời điểm (dữ liệu bảng) thì việc sử dụng phần mềm EVIEWS là phù hợp hơn cả. Những chức năng chính của EVIEWS gồm:
– Phân tích dữ liệu chuỗi thời gian, dữ liệu chéo, dữ liệu mảng
– Thống kê mô tả dữ liệu
– Phân tích sự tác động của các yếu tố này lên các yếu tố khác
– Dự báo cho yếu tố cần nghiên cứu ( ví dụ như dự báo giá xăng dầu, nhu cầu năng lượng, giá vàng,…)

3. Các bước tiến hành phân tích bằng Eviews

Quy trình các bước tiến hành nghiên cứu định lượng
– Xác định và làm rõ vấn đề nghiên cứu
– Nghiên cứu các lý thuyết liên quan và các mô hình đánh giá
– Thiết lập mô hình nghiên cứu
– Xây dựng thang đo, bảng câu hỏi cho nghiên cứu
– Điều tra, thu thập dữ liệu nghiên cứu
– Phân tích dữ liệu nghiên cứu
– Trình bày các kết quả nghiên cứu
– Kết luận và kiến nghị, hoàn thiện luận văn
Cũng giống như quy trình nghiên cứu định lượng. Về chi tiết cho từng lĩnh vực, từng phần mềm thì có các bước khác biệt một chút.
Với EViews chúng ta sẽ không phải thực hiện bước 4 : Xây dựng thang đo, bảng câu hỏi cho nghiên cứu nữa. Còn lại các bước vẫn giống như một nghiên cứu định lượng tổng quan như trong hình vẽ.

4. Một số đề tài luận văn sử dụng Eviews

Nghiên cứu các yếu tố tác động tới giá vàng trong nước.
Nghiên cứu các yếu tố tác động tới giá thép trong nước.
Các yếu tố tác động tới hiệu quả hoạt động của các công ty ngành xyz.
Tác động của cấu trúc vốn lên hoạt động của các công ty niêm yết trên sàn giao dịch
Tính toán rủi ro và xếp hạng tín dụng của ngân hàng XYZ.
Tính toán giá trị rủi ro Var của danh mục đầu tư trên sàn giao dịch chứng khoán.
Tác động của hội đồng quản trị tới hiệu quả hoạt động Tobin’s Q của các công ty XYZ.

5. Hướng dẫn dowload và cài đặt phần mềm Eviews

5.1. Hướng dẫn cài đặt Eviews 7

B1. Tải về sau đó dùng Winrar giải nén (Click chuột phải chọn Extract here) rồi tiến hành cài đặt theo hướng dẫn. Nếu chưa có Winrar thì tải về ở tab Phần Mềm Học Tập
B2. Sau khi giải nén hết các file vào một thư mục nào đấy chúng ta tiến hành cài đặt theo các bước dưới đây:
Chạy file Autorun.exe
Click: Install EViews
Tiếp tục chọn Next –> Yes –> Next
Tới bước này họ đòi serial thì các bạn điền vào là DEMO rồi tiếp tục nhấn OK/Next và đợi cho cho trình cài đặt hoàn tất.
B3. Máy hỏi Bạn có muốn tạo biểu tượng(icon) hay shortcut trên Desktop hay không thì bạn nhớ chọn No nhé.
B4. Xong xuôi các bạn không vội chạy chương trình này mà tiến hành làm bước cuối cùng đấy là: copy file EViews7.exe trong thư mục REDT mà chúng ta vừa giải nén được vào thư mục cài đặt của chương trình theo đường dẫn sau:
C:\Program Files\EViews7\ (nơi bạn cho cài phần mềm Eviews 7 trong máy)
Khi đó máy có hỏi là bạn có muốn thay thế file EViews7.exe đã có sẵn hay không?
Nhấn Yes để đồng ý.
B5. Copy file EViews7.exe (file vừa mới copy sang) ra màn hình desktop để sử dụng.

5.2. Hướng dẫn cài đặt Eviews 10

Lưu ý trước khi cài đặt Eviews. Sau khi tải phần mềm eview về bạn nhớ tắt hết phần mềm diệt virus, tắt mạng internet.
Bước 1: Giải nén file vừa download về Tải về sau đó dùng Winrar giải nén (Click chuột phải chọn Extract here) rồi tiến hành cài đặt theo hướng dẫn Chạy file Setup cài đặt phần mềm đúng phiên bản windows 32bit hoặc 64bit
Bước 2. Sau khi giải nén hết các file vào một thư mục nào đấy chúng ta tiến hành cài đặt theo các bước dưới đây:Chạy file Autorun.exe Click: Install EViews Tiếp tục chọn Next –> Yes –> Next Tới bước này họ đòi serial thì các bạn điền vào là DEMO rồi tiếp tục nhấn OK/Next và đợi cho cho trình cài đặt hoàn tất.
Bước 3. Máy hỏi Bạn có muốn tạo biểu tượng(icon) hay shortcut trên Desktop hay không thì bạn nhớ chọn No nhé.
Bước 4. Xong xuôi các bạn không vội chạy chương trình này mà tiến hành làm bước cuối cùng đấy là: copy file EViews10.exe trong thư mục REDT mà chúng ta vừa giải nén được vào thư mục cài đặt của chương trình theo đường dẫn sau: C:\Program Files\EViews10\ (nơi bạn cho cài phần mềm Eviews 10 trong máy)
Khi đó máy có hỏi là bạn có muốn thay thế file EViews7.exe đã có sẵn hay không? Nhấn Yes để đồng ý.
Bước 5. Bạn click phải vào file EViews10.exe (file vừa mới copy sang) –> chọn send to desktop
#Luận_văn_24 , #thuê_chạy_spss
Xem thêm: https://luanvan24.com/gioi-thieu-ve-phan-mem-eviews-va-cac-phien-ban-eviews-hien-hanh/
submitted by luanvan24 to u/luanvan24

0 thoughts on “Crack noiseware professional v4.1.1.0 for adobe photoshop

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *